Following are LOBBYCO'S current important CAMPAIGNS for CHANGES that NEED to HAPPEN as soon as reasonably possible through our national governments making new laws to enable "Quality of Life for All!" no matter what country we were born.

Each CAMPAIGN applies Essential Economics (#EssentialEconomics) principles that along with each other campaign interacts with the other to create a beautiful tapestry of national laws for lives to be able to thrive . . .

"Time great politics became known as great art
- if we don't have great politics . . .
WE can't ALL have GREAT LIVES!"

#1 CAMPAIGN is . . .
#PEACE4ALL

An important part of ensuring "Quality of Life for All!" is ensuring all people LIVE IN PEACE and therefore have dignity throughout their whole lives.

Peace for ALL would certainly be advantageous to all Australians!

#2 CAMPAIGN is . . .
#VoiceTreatyTruth = #VoiceToParliament

An important part of ensuring "Quality of Life for All!" is ensuring all people have dignity throughout their whole lives.

Although the YES Vote did not pass the 2023 referendum in the affirmative - it is clear there is still unfinished business:
"For close to a century, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people have called and fought for a seat at the table."...
http://www.reconciliation.org.au/reconciliation/support-a-voice-to-parliament/100-years-of-calls-for-voice/

Anybody who cares about justice knows this is Australia's number one social and political priority!

Time Australian's were on the right side of herstory and history - NOT the wrong side.

The Voice to Parliament would certainly be advantageous to all Australians . . . but is likely now to only happen when we have become a mature nation NOT as the naive mentally immature one we are currently!

#3 CAMPAIGN is . . .
#TreatyNOW!

An important part of ensuring "Quality of Life for All!" is ensuring "TreatyNOW!" becomes reality, by ensuring all Australians finally recognise our First Nations with their Indigenous Treaty.

This campaign is in honour of all Indigenous people who have been waiting since this country was colonised!

As i am not Indigenous i cannot speak for them so let's listen when they speak and hear what they need!

Treaty NOW would certainly be advantageous to all Australians!

#4 CAMPAIGN is . . .
#STOPtheWARonthePOOR

An important part of ensuring "Quality of Life for All!" is ensuring we all Stop the War on the Poor!

Anybody who cares about justice knows this is the world's number one social and political priority!

Any person who doesn't agree, is on the wrong side of herstory and history.

To Stop the War on the Poor would certainly be advantageous to all world citizens!

#5 CAMPAIGN is . . .
#QualityOfLife4ALL!

To ensure "Quality of Life for All!" which is not currently the case in Australia (and most countries throughout the world), our government needs to believe #EssentialEconomics are paramount and therefore front and centre in government priorities in making new laws and eradicating old ones that are no longer fit for purpose!

Quality of Life for All can only be maintained long-term througout people's lives from birth until death when various safety net laws are law and therefore become reality in this new 21st Century.

Quality of Life for All would certainly be advantageous to all Australians . . .

Here are a few suggestions to help either encourage or ensure "Quality of Life for All!"

#6 CAMPAIGN is . . .
#HERITAGEandEQUITY4ALL!

An important part of ensuring "Quality of Life for All!" is ensuring all people receive legally "HERITAGE and EQUITY for ALL!" and finally recognising such when Wills are written and before they can be legally signed.

This campaign is in honour of all the child beneficiaries who have had their ancestral heritage or access to such, stolen by laypeople, testators, lawyers, judges (throughout the centuries) who have failed to understand all children are inalienable custodians to family homes if they are kept and not sold after their parent/s have died. Under natural law and therefore every person's human rights it is therefore ethically, morally and legally acceptable for all people to assume such access and continued connection to one or more family homes that if not being sold for the monetary benefit of all children, therfore must remain for all children's non-monetary benefit.

Women are probably the people more likely to have had their access to their family home/s and ancestral collections denied to them for the rest of their lives - this important campaign to raise awareness of this injustice is paramount to the benefit of all families.

I am writing here from personal experience as i am currently in the Supreme Court of South Australia (SCSA) seeking all my equal CEDAW legal rights to both my parents' ancestral family estates or my equitable inheritance rights in monetary and non-monetary (ongoing invaluable lifetime heritage access to three family homes and all ancestral items) equity to be finally acknowledged as currently only am i 'indirectly' equal to my two elder male siblings under the CEDAW Treaty ratified by the Australian Government on behalf of all Australian women on Thursday 28 July 1983. However based on over 3 years of legal research into my equal rights under the Rule of Law in Australia i have come to the legal conclusion as a layperson that in 1984 when our national and state government passed into statute the Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (SDA84) and the Equal Opportunity Act 1984 (EOA84) respectively the following year as part of their obligations to CEDAW both governments failed to also 'directly' ensure that Australian women didn't also have to go to Court to ensure they were not discriminated against in their equal rights to their inheritance as their male siblings. This i see as an extreme violation of Australian women's rights under CEDAW not to be discriminated against in "ALL FORMS". Therefore why i am having to apply to the Court to include both our national and state of South Australia Attorney Generals as separate respondents to answer as to why they have neglected to ensure that women of Australia do not have to go to Court to defend their equal inheritance rights under CEDAW. Also i am having to apply to theSCSA for the three lawyers to be included as respondents who are all trying to defend their rights to continue to continue to represent my brothers to continue to discriminate against me - which i have come to legally understand based on my 'indirect' legal rights - under CEDAW not to be discriminated against in "ALL FORMS" - who have each based on when they came into the case and choosing to represent my brothers have each subsequently illegitimately and unjustly advised my brothers since 2021 that each of my brothers have the legal right to discriminate against me in relation to my 'indirect' legal rights under CEDAW - although it it very clear under CEDAW as previously stated women in Australia are not to be discriminated against in "ALL FORMS" in regard to men.

Therefore...
Why should a female child or any other child be treated any differently?
1. If one or more children are receiving access to their kept family homes for the rest of their lives - so should all!
2. If one or more children are receiving monetary equity from their family estate - so should all in equal measure after the reconciled net equity of all assets is determined from the gross equity!
3. If one or more children are receiving their own equity to independently administer without another sibling's' interference or intervention - so should all!

The Convention for the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) - based on prior High Court of Australia (HCA) rulings in regards to how individuals should be treated in regards to their human rights under ratified treaties - its likely such legally means, like all women in Australia, i have 'indirect legal human rights' via all Courts in Australia under the CEDAW treaty not to be allowed to be legally discriminated against in "All Forms" since 1983. Therefore it is reasonable to assume based on all the evidence i have already filed with the SCSA that the 2018 Will presented and granted probate in July 2022 has violated and breached my rights on too many multiple counts, which is backed up by the firsthad direct evidence in the 2018 Will File Notes the Court ordered i recieve - that is because legally, although i currently do not have 'direct' statute legal rights in all Inheritance Laws in South Australia (as states control such not our national government) it is fair to say i do have such 'indirect' rights via the CEDAW Treaty instead because for 40 years now since 1983 the state and national governments have not worked together to lobby each successive parliament to ensure such 'direct' state statute LEGAL DUTY OF CARE anti-discrimination protections exist which are enforceable by such laws, so directly in the first instance before writing a Will either for themselves or on behalf of another person/s, that all people in Australia are legally aware that whether as a layperson, sibling, lawyer, testator, etc discrimination of any form in non-monetary and monetary terms against women is illegal and a direct enforcable offence with costs and damages to meet the degree of offence so all discrimination is fully recoverable in "ALL FORMS".

On this legal basis i state my claims to be legally true based on these current Australian international law obligations under the Rule of Law in Australia:

1. "Article 27 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties provides that: 'A party may not invoke the provisions of its internal law as justification for its failure to perform a treaty'. - Parliament of Australia website: aph.gov.au

2. "These treaties, which Australia has voluntarily entered in, set out in clear tems Australia's international human rights obligations. Under international law, Australia is bound to comply with their provisions and to implement them domestically." - Law Council of Australia (Australia's International Human Rights Obligations: lawcouncil.au/policy-agenda/human-rights/australias-international-human-rights-obligations)

3. "The Australian Government also noted that the Government did not consider it necessary to enact a Human Rights Act or amend the Constitution, owing to the existing protections, including the requirements that new bills are accompanied by a statement of compatability with human rights." - Law Council of Australia (Australia's International Human Rights Obligations: lawcouncil.au/policy-agenda/human-rights/australias-international-human-rights-obligations)

4. "A person's ability to enjoy their human rights depends on other people respecting those rights. This means that human rights involve responsibility and duties towards other people and the community. Individuals have a responsibility to ensure that they exercise their rights with consideration for the rights of others." - Australian Human Rights Commission website: humanrights.gov.au

5. "No person should be subject to treatment or punishment which is inconsistent with respect for the inherent dignity of every human being." And, "States must comply with their international legal obligations whether created by treaty or arising under customary international law." - Law Council of Australia (Rule of Law: lawcouncil.au/policy-agenda/international-law/rule-of-law)

6. "Both states and individuals are entitled to expect that other states will comply with and honour their international legal obligations, including obligations relating to the promotion and protection of human rights. States must avoid inconsistencies between their international legal obligations and their domestic laws and policies." - Law Council of Australia (1103-Policy-Statement-Rule-Of-Law-Principles.pdf)


It is commonly held to be understood that since the CEDAW Treaty's ratification on 28 July 1983 that... "In Australia, women have the same rights as men. This is in all parts of life - in the family, the community, in education, and in relation to service in the political life of the society." - University of New South Wales - So for any person including legal practitioners in any capacity from senior to junior to assume or make a legal claim that CEDAW is meritless as or in a claim or as a Cause of Action (CoA) (when there has been 'causation' or damages incurred then rectification and continuation of full rights and damages payable in non-monetary and monetary terms is necessary) to ensure discrimination does not continue to occur to any woman or women in any way is legally absurd, then they must have been living in a different vortex for the HCA has been basing their decisions on individual's and group's human rights since 1992 in MABO (group) and since 1995 TEOH (individual) - paving the way for all lower courts to show legal respect Australia's international treaty law obligations for over 40 years now!

No woman or women in Australia should have to attend a Court in Australia to prove they deserve equal treatment to any man or men in "ALL FORMS" anymore - yet here i am having to do so - 40 years later. A woman's or women's legal human rights in the CEDAW Treaty have never had to be tested in the HCA because it is just common sense that discrimination in all forms should not happen to women in anyway - i can only hope justice in full prevails in the SCSA in "ALL FORMS" soon, and if it doesn't all my claims should be heard "In the Public's Interest" for the public good in the HCA, forthwith - because justice needs to be done in Australia on this issue so no other woman or women (no any other gender) are discriminated against when a Will is written and before it can be legally signed in this country ever again without enforceable extreme penalties for failure of duty of care to ensure disclosure in "ALL FORMS" and and therefore limit fraud and discrimination in "ALL FORMS".

Our national and state and territory governments have a duty to ensure duty of care measure are in place so no partner, nor any child beneficiaries are discriminated against based on the anti-discrimination principles in "ALL FORMS" privately and publicly of the CEDAW Treaty, or which Australia voluntarily accepted legally binding international obligations via ratification on 28 July 1983.

HERITAGE and EQUITY 4 ALL would certainly be advantageous to all Australians!

#7 CAMPAIGN is . . .
#ReligionsAPOLOGISE!

An important part of ensuring "Quality of Life for All!" is ensuring all people are ensured dignity throughout their whole life, therefore it is time: "Religions Apologise!" after too many centuries of vilifying and discriminating against diverse family members!

It is of utmost importance to ensure all people remain equal from birth until death - part of that is ensuring religions, religious organisations including religous schools and religious individuals and groups don't discriminate against diverse children and adults including students and teachers or any school administration staff of any age - whether at private and public schools.

As a diverse person myself i can say from my own experience and those of family members and friends that too many diverse citizens throughout the world have lived lives and multi millions continue to live lives of fear or diminished lives due to the highly inappropriate religious persecution which encompass many forms of abuse in its multitude of absolutely unnecessary guises.

It is time #OURgovt drew an ethical, moral and political line in the sand and began defunding and removing charity and tax-free status from all religions, religious schools and religious organisations and non-profits etc who fail to embrace diversity fully - Any religion failing to finally end all the direct and indirect psychological abuses and discrimination should understand that public funds should no longer be utilised by national governments to fund or support such religions or religious entities in any way as it has now come to be understood to be highly unconscionable in this the 21st Century!

Time Religions APOLOGISE - would certainly be advantageous to all Australians!

#8 CAMPAIGN is . . .
#ENDsexism = Individuals1st!

An important part of ensuring "Quality of Life for All!" is ensuring welfare laws are not sexist!

This campaign's aim is to end the sexism so women are access for welfare based on their own income and assets not their partner's nor their parent's' income and assets.

Ending sexism in welfare laws would certainly be advantageous to all Australians!

#9 CAMPAIGN is . . .
#KeepYOURname!

An important part of ensuring "Quality of Life for All!" is ensuring all people don't feel pressured to change their birth name.

This campaign is in honour of most of my childhood girlfriends, 'cause most went off and got married and changed their last name and they are hard to find, and most i cannot contact anymore due to their name change. Like lost people from my life, i mourn the loss of them all - with this cry for change! We don't expect men to change their names when they marry why should that same expectation be on women?

Women have a right to KEEP their own birth name . . . #Herstory is just as important as history!

Also why shouldn't a female child take her mother's name and a male child their father' surname instead?. . . time for discussion and action!

Keep YOUR Name would certainly be advantageous to all Australians!

#10 CAMPAIGN is . . .
#ENDpoverty!

An important part of ensuring "Quality of Life for All!" is ensuring no person lives in poverty - that means every adult should have at least income of #88aDAY which is the #HendersonPovertyLine in Australia in 2024.

Therefore to END POVERTY every family member has to vote at elections for policies that ensure any of their family members reliant on #Centrelink who cannot work receives a benefit of at least #88aDAY!

For family members that are assessed as only being able to work part-time non of their safety net benefit should be reduced or extinguished and only income earnt above $52k a year should be taxable.

No person in Australia should pay tax on income less than $52k a year: therefore the need for a #52kAyearTaxFreeThreshold.

To END POVERTY would certainly be advantageous to all Australians!

#11 CAMPAIGN is . . .
#INCOME4ALL!

An important part of ensuring "Quality of Life for All!" is utilising an Essential Economics principle of Income For All which means in short no matter what your circumstance and based on need you are guaranteed by our government income above the poverty line which in Australia in 2024 is currently $88 a day, and therefore also a person's eligibility for Centrelink should be based on a person's OWN income and assets NOT a partner's or parent's income and assets.

Income For All would certainly be advantageous to all Australians!

#12 CAMPAIGN is . . .
#HomemakersWAGE!

An important part of ensuring "Quality of Life for All!" is ensuring #OURgovt begins the process of ensuring a Homemakers Wage for the sake of all Australians.

A HomemakersWAGE would certainly be advantageous to all Australians!

#13 CAMPAIGN is . . .
#CentrelinkREFORM!

An important part of ensuring "Quality of Life for All!" is ensuring #OURgovt begins the process of Centrelink Reform for the sake of all Australians.

Centrelink Reform would certainly be advantageous to all Australians!

#14 CAMPAIGN is . . .
#DebtFreeINCOME!

An important part of ensuring "Quality of Life for All!" is by ensuring taxes should NOT have to be found to provide Essential Income for citizens, its time world governments produced Debt Free Income so taxpayers are not expected to foot the bill for an essential service that the government can provide debt free!

Debt Free Income would certainly be advantageous to all Australians!

#15 CAMPAIGN is . . .
#GROSScommunityTAX!

An important part of ensuring "Quality of Life for All!" is utilising an Essential Economics principle for our government to be assured tax revenue to provide all the essential and necessary services businesses and people alike need, the implementation of a Gross Community Tax (GCT) would help ensure business and community alike have a community in which they are proud to live and work which helps ensure "quality of life" outcomes for business and citizen alike!

An added benefit of such a gross community tax would be the percentage of tax could be increased or decreased based on our government's need to reduce or increase revenue to pay for our essential services to be maintained effectively!

Gross Community Tax would certainly be advantageous to most Australians!

#16 CAMPAIGN is . . .
#GROSSinflationTAX!

An important part of ensuring "Quality of Life for All!" is ensuring inflation does not get out of control!

A Gross Inflation Tax (GIT) would be an Essential Economic tool our government could utilise to increase or decrease the inflation rather than relying on the current economic tool which the government and Reserve Bank of Australia use which is to increase of decrease interest rates on housing loans which increases can adversely affects those that can least afford it; just like a rise in the GST does to our most disadvantaged - therefore the GIT would control inflation by targeting the very means which creates inflation to begin with.

Gross Inflation Tax would certainly be advantageous to all Australians!

#17 CAMPAIGN is . . .
#NOmoreWorkingPOOR = 52kMinimumWage + 52kTaxFreeThreshold!

An important part of ensuring "Quality of Life for All!" is tax payable is fair and reasonable for those that can afford to pay tax in the first place!

This campaign's aim is to create equitable outcomes and ensure income tax is only paid by those who can afford to NOT those who cannot!

$52k Tax Free Threshold on all income tax would certainly be advantageous to all Australians!